An unexpected error occured

I keep getting this when trying to create a new vault. Using Mac Mojave and Fuse and locating the vault on my internal hard drive. Help! Thanks, Harry
Data Below:

org.cryptomator.common.vaults.Volume$VolumeException: Unable to mount Filesystem
	at org.cryptomator.common.vaults.FuseVolume.mount(FuseVolume.java:107)
	at org.cryptomator.common.vaults.FuseVolume.mount(FuseVolume.java:58)
	at org.cryptomator.common.vaults.Vault.unlock(Vault.java:129)
	at org.cryptomator.ui.unlock.UnlockWorkflow.attemptUnlock(UnlockWorkflow.java:103)
	at org.cryptomator.ui.unlock.UnlockWorkflow.call(UnlockWorkflow.java:80)
	at org.cryptomator.ui.unlock.UnlockWorkflow.call(UnlockWorkflow.java:43)
	at javafx.concurrent.Task$TaskCallable.call(Task.java:1425)
	at java.base/java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.run(Unknown Source)
	at java.base/java.util.concurrent.Executors$RunnableAdapter.call(Unknown Source)
	at java.base/java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.run(Unknown Source)
	at java.base/java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(Unknown Source)
	at java.base/java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(Unknown Source)
	at java.base/java.lang.Thread.run(Unknown Source)
Caused by: org.cryptomator.frontend.fuse.mount.CommandFailedException: ru.serce.jnrfuse.FuseException: Unable to mount FS
	at org.cryptomator.frontend.fuse.mount.MacMounter.mount(MacMounter.java:45)
	at org.cryptomator.common.vaults.FuseVolume.mount(FuseVolume.java:105)
	... 12 more
Caused by: ru.serce.jnrfuse.FuseException: Unable to mount FS
	at ru.serce.jnrfuse.AbstractFuseFS.mount(AbstractFuseFS.java:287)
	at org.cryptomator.frontend.fuse.mount.MacMounter.mount(MacMounter.java:43)
	... 13 more
Caused by: ru.serce.jnrfuse.FuseException: Unable to mount FS, return code = 1
	at ru.serce.jnrfuse.AbstractFuseFS.mount(AbstractFuseFS.java:283)
	... 14 more
org.cryptomator.common.vaults.Volume$VolumeException: Unable to mount Filesystem
	at org.cryptomator.common.vaults.FuseVolume.mount(FuseVolume.java:107)
	at org.cryptomator.common.vaults.FuseVolume.mount(FuseVolume.java:58)
	at org.cryptomator.common.vaults.Vault.unlock(Vault.java:129)
	at org.cryptomator.ui.unlock.UnlockWorkflow.attemptUnlock(UnlockWorkflow.java:103)
	at org.cryptomator.ui.unlock.UnlockWorkflow.call(UnlockWorkflow.java:80)
	at org.cryptomator.ui.unlock.UnlockWorkflow.call(UnlockWorkflow.java:43)
	at javafx.concurrent.Task$TaskCallable.call(Task.java:1425)
	at java.base/java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.run(Unknown Source)
	at java.base/java.util.concurrent.Executors$RunnableAdapter.call(Unknown Source)
	at java.base/java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.run(Unknown Source)
	at java.base/java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(Unknown Source)
	at java.base/java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(Unknown Source)
	at java.base/java.lang.Thread.run(Unknown Source)
Caused by: org.cryptomator.frontend.fuse.mount.CommandFailedException: ru.serce.jnrfuse.FuseException: Unable to mount FS
	at org.cryptomator.frontend.fuse.mount.MacMounter.mount(MacMounter.java:45)
	at org.cryptomator.common.vaults.FuseVolume.mount(FuseVolume.java:105)
	... 12 more
Caused by: ru.serce.jnrfuse.FuseException: Unable to mount FS
	at ru.serce.jnrfuse.AbstractFuseFS.mount(AbstractFuseFS.java:287)
	at org.cryptomator.frontend.fuse.mount.MacMounter.mount(MacMounter.java:43)
	... 13 more
Caused by: ru.serce.jnrfuse.FuseException: Unable to mount FS, return code = 1
	at ru.serce.jnrfuse.AbstractFuseFS.mount(AbstractFuseFS.java:283)
	... 14 more

Does it help if you update “FUSE for macOS” to the latest version? https://osxfuse.github.io/

Hi, thanks for your reply.
I am using Fuse 3.11.0, which the website says is the latest version without success.

Please try the workaround described here: [1.5.7] Unable to mount Filesystem: Unexpected error during unlock a newly created Vault (macOS) · Issue #1310 · cryptomator/cryptomator · GitHub

Workaround:

  1. Select the vault in Cryptomator.
  2. Press “Vault Options”.
  3. Select the tab “Mounting”.
  4. “Drive Name” is probably empty, give it some name.

Yes, that does work. Thank you for that.
Apparently, this is a bug in the program and is being corrected with the next version which is already available.
Thanks again, Harry